Trying to separate fact from fiction is part of a journalist's job, but in Moscow you have to learn to treat some reports with a large dose of scepticism.
On Tuesday afternoon, the Russian state news channel Rossiya 24 reported that between four and 11 people had been killed when Ukrainian government forces recaptured control of an airfield in Kramatorsk, which had earlier been controlled by pro-Russian protesters.
Other Russian news agencies reported several deaths.
It seemed as if it might be a watershed moment, likely to trigger a military response from the Kremlin which has pledged to protect ethnic Russians.
The Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement expressing deep concern and saying events were developing into a "worst case scenario."
But later reports filed by international news organisations such as Reuters and the Associated Press revealed a much less serious incident.
True, Ukrainian soldiers had arrived at the scene and took some verbal abuse from protesters.
Warning shots may have been fired and an officer had his hat knocked off in scuffles.
Tension remains and it is always a worrying development when a country's military confronts its own citizens.
But it still seems some way short of the civil war that Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said Ukraine was on the brink of.
Armed men stand near armoured personnel carriers in Slavyansk Equally, those who suggest that everyone who has manned a barricade or occupied a government office in eastern Ukraine is either a Russian agent or cajoled by the Kremlin is also exaggerating.
Yes, there appear to be many examples of men taking charge who display some form of military training, but recent video footage of people forcing a Ukrainian tank to turn around suggests they were angry locals rather than crack troops.
When the West cries too loudly about Russian influence it can drown out the genuine voices of those Ukrainians in the East who don't like the western-leaning interim government in Kiev.
The Russian media ridicules the EU and the US for lauding the civil protests which forced elected President Viktor Yanukovych to flee the country, and yet the same governments condemn Russian-speaking Ukrainians supporters for being angry about what they view as an illegitimate coup.
The truth is out there, and the UN has published a version of it, which found claims of attacks on ethnic Russians had been deliberately exaggerated to justify Russian intervention in Crimea last month.
A woman takes a picture of potentially pro-Russian soldiers The UN Human Rights report said assaults were not widespread and that reports of nationalist extremists "coming armed to persecute ethnic Russians in Crimea were systematically used to create a climate of fear and insecurity that reflected on support to integration of Crimea into the Russian Federation".
The Russian foreign ministry said the UN report was "one-sided, politicised and not objective", adding: "One gets the impression that the report was fabricated to correspond with conclusions formed in advance."
The annexation of Crimea was popular in Russia because it returned a territory which was historically Russian, but which was ceded to Ukraine during the Soviet era when Moscow still retained overall control.
But there appears to be little appetite among ordinary Russians for trying to seize chunks of eastern Ukraine, even if many of those who live there speak Russian.
Lisa Zelaney, a student at Moscow State University, told Sky News she had friends in Ukraine and, although she supported Crimea returning to Russian control, the current situation was different, and she was dubious about Russian media reports.
Armed men drive military vehicles outside Kramatorsk "When you hear people say, 'Yes, we want Russian people to get here and help us get rid of this government, that we don't like it,' that's not usually the truth.
"I think we should leave this country alone and let them themselves decide what they need."
Pensioner Vladimir Pantileymonovich told us: "By no means should Russia interfere in the eastern Ukraine situation. It's their own business."
And Dina Boulatova added: "We should definitely not get into it, otherwise there will be huge problems for Russia. The two sides there should take a step towards each other."
But another man was more sympathetic to Kremlin policy.
Ukrainian soldiers clash in a field with pro-Russian protesters Elizarov Leonid Mikhailovich said: "For me personally everything is very clear. The majority of the population expressed their opinion. They said what they wanted and how they wanted it.
"The methods that the Kiev authorities are using now are horrible. They were elected in a barbarous way.
"I think the majority in Ukraine understand this government does not have a future.
"I may not support Putin or like him but on this issue I completely support him. Russia is strong enough now to support its people."
As for criticism of a foreign government meddling in the affairs of another, the Russian media reported on evidence to confirm their suspicions the interim government in Kiev came to power as the result of an American-backed coup.
The confirmation by the White House that CIA director John Brennan was a visitor to Kiev at the weekend fuelled Moscow suspicions of the agency's involvement in supporting the Maidan protesters.
The White House said his arrival in Ukraine was simply part of a wider European tour.
Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang
Digging For The Truth Over Russia And Ukraine
Dengan url
https://tampolantelak.blogspot.com/2014/04/digging-for-truth-over-russia-and.html
Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya
Digging For The Truth Over Russia And Ukraine
namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link
Digging For The Truth Over Russia And Ukraine
sebagai sumbernya
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar